A selection of 25 solved questions — sign up free to practise all 327.
Q1Polity & Governance·Political Theory and Comparative ConceptsPYQ 2026
Ms. X is a mid-level civil service official working in the urban development department of a major city. Recently, she was involved in approving a contract for a public infrastructure project—a new community park. During the approval process, she received a piece of confidential information indicating that one of the shortlisted contractors had a history of poor workmanship and allegations of corruption in other cities, though nothing had been legally proven. The Head of the Department, Mr. Y, advised her not to disclose this information to the project committee or the public because it could delay the project and damage the city’s reputation. However, Ms. X believed that withholding such information compromised transparency and public trust. What amongst the following should Ms. X do now?
1. Immediately disclose the information to the project committee and the public
2. Recommend removing the contractor from the shortlist to protect the project’s integrity
3. Propose a ‘limited disclosure’ to an oversight committee, while keeping the information confidential from the public for the time being
Select the answer using the code given below:
- A1 and 2 only
- B3 onlyCorrect
- C2 and 3 only
- D1, 2 and 3
Explanation
UPSC provisional key: (B), Series A question 53. Statement 3 best balances integrity, confidentiality and fairness. Limited disclosure to an authorised oversight committee allows the concern to be checked and considered without prematurely publishing allegations or excluding the contractor. It also avoids silently withholding relevant risk information merely to protect the department’s reputation.
Sources: UPSC provisional answer key · UPSC CSE Preliminary Examination 2026 GS I question paper, scenario as printed
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Immediate public disclosure may expose confidential, unverified allegations, while removing the contractor before verification risks unfair treatment. The scenario calls for proportionate scrutiny through an appropriate oversight body, not treating an allegation as a proven finding.
- Option C
Limited disclosure is appropriate, but automatically recommending removal at this stage jumps ahead of verification and fair assessment. A history of allegations is relevant to due diligence, yet the scenario explicitly says the allegations have not been legally proved.
- Option D
This combines the proportionate oversight response with premature public disclosure and exclusion. The better immediate step is controlled escalation for verification; subsequent disclosure or procurement action should depend on the evidence and applicable procedure.
Q2Polity & Governance·Important Acts and Rights-Based GovernancePYQ 2026
Which of the following statements about a Zero First Information Report (Zero FIR) under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 is/are correct?
1. A Zero FIR can be lodged at a police station, even though the place of commission of a cognizable/non-cognizable offence is outside the territorial jurisdiction of that police station.
2. The Officer-in-Charge of the police station where a Zero FIR has been lodged may, with the permission of the competent authority, initiate a preliminary enquiry.
3. Under Zero FIR, it is obligatory for the informant to furnish information electronically.
Select the answer using the code given below:
- A1, 2 and 3
- B2 and 3 only
- C1 only
- D2 onlyCorrect
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Statements 1 and 3 are incorrect. BNSS section 173 concerns information about cognizable offences regardless of where they occurred; non-cognizable information has a separate procedure under section 174. Information need not be electronic, since oral information is also expressly permitted.
- Option B
The key accepts statement 2, but statement 3 wrongly makes electronic reporting compulsory. Section 173 permits oral or electronic information; when electronic communication is used, the informant must sign within three days for it to be taken on record.
- Option C
Statement 1 wrongly combines cognizable and non-cognizable offences. Territorial neutrality for recording a cognizable offence does not erase the separate legal treatment of non-cognizable information. The fact that a station is outside the place of occurrence is not itself a reason to refuse cognizable information.
Q3Polity & Governance·Political Theory and Comparative ConceptsPYQ 2026
Mr. X, a senior officer, was overseeing a critical vaccination programme during a pandemic. He found that a private service provider responsible for vaccine distribution was compromising on quality to make profits. Despite immense pressure to manage the issue due to vested interests, he raised his voice based on the principles of public administration which he learnt during various training programmes attended across his career. He reported the issue to the appropriate vigilance authority and halted the contract to ensure citizen welfare.
Which one among the following principles of public administration was most strongly demonstrated by Mr. X’s actions?
- AEsprit de corps
- BEquity
- CAccountabilityCorrect
- DDelegation
Explanation
UPSC provisional key: (C), Series A question 51. Accountability is the strongest fit because the officer reports misconduct to the appropriate authority and acts against a contractor compromising public welfare. The scenario illustrates answerability and consequences despite pressure from vested interests. Integrity and courage are also present, but accountability is the best match among the listed principles.
Sources: UPSC provisional answer key · UPSC CSE Preliminary Examination 2026 GS I question paper, scenario as printed
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Esprit de corps means team spirit and solidarity within an organisation. The defining action here is not building group cohesion but reporting a contractor’s misconduct and enforcing responsibility for a public service.
- Option B
Equity concerns fairness, including how benefits and burdens are distributed. Protecting citizens can serve equity, but the question gives no central dispute about unequal allocation; it emphasises reporting wrongdoing and holding a service provider answerable.
- Option D
Delegation means assigning authority or tasks to another person while retaining appropriate oversight. The officer’s decisive conduct is exposing a breach and enforcing responsibility, not transferring his own duties to a subordinate.
Q4Polity & Governance·Federalism and Local GovernancePYQ 2026
Consider the following statements about the provisions pertaining to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in India:
1. Provisions regarding the administration of the Tribal Areas in the States of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram are given in the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution of India.
2. Some tribes of India are entitled to exemption from paying Income Tax on certain incomes.
3. The Constitution of India provides for reservation of seats in Panchayats for women belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes.
Which one of the following conclusions based on the above statements is correct?
- AThere are two correct statements, that include statement 2.Correct
- BThere are two correct statements, that are statements 1 and 3.
- CThere is only one correct statement.
- DAll three statements are correct.
Explanation
UPSC provisional key: (A), Series A question 57. Statements 2 and 3 are correct. Schedule III, item 19, read with section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 excludes specified income of eligible Scheduled Tribe members; this is not a blanket exemption for all tribal people or income. Article 243D reserves a portion of SC/ST Panchayat seats for women. Statement 1 should say Sixth Schedule, not Fifth Schedule.
Sources: UPSC provisional answer key · India Code: Constitution of India, Articles 13, 243D, 244 and 393–395 · TRIFED: Tribal areas under the Sixth Schedule · Kerala local government law manual: Article 243D(2) · Income Tax Department: Income-tax Act, 2025, section 11 and Schedule III item 19
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option B
Statement 3 is correct, but statement 1 assigns the four named states to the wrong schedule. Article 244 connects Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram’s tribal areas with the Sixth Schedule; the Fifth Schedule is the other scheduled-area framework.
- Option C
Two statements, not one, are correct. There are qualified tax exemptions for specified Scheduled Tribe members and constitutional reservation for SC/ST women in Panchayats, while the Fifth/Sixth Schedule substitution makes statement 1 false.
- Option D
Statement 1 prevents all three from being correct. The crucial distinction is the Sixth Schedule’s arrangements for tribal areas in the four named states; statements 2 and 3 separately concern qualified tax relief and political representation.
Q5Polity & Governance·Political Theory and Comparative ConceptsPYQ 2026
In a multi-ethnic district where both economic competition and historical grievances frequently led to community tensions, a flashpoint has arisen with a Government decision to allocate land for a waste management facility near a tribal hamlet, sparking protests by the tribal community, which claimed that the land was sacred and critical to their cultural identity. At the same time, urban residents and local industries supported the project, citing severe solid waste challenges and health concerns due to lack of a proper disposal site. The conflict has escalated with road blockades, social media campaigns, and allegations of police excesses. As a responsible Government official, you are tasked with resolving the situation through mediation, ensuring a sustainable outcome that balances environmental needs, tribal rights, and urban public health. Consider the following statements with reference to the above:
1. A successful conflict resolution process must begin with acknowledging the cultural concerns of the protesting tribal community before discussing technical alternatives.
2. The Government should move ahead with the project without delay to address urban health concerns, which outweigh the sentiments of a small group.
3. Creating a multi-stakeholder dialogue platform — including tribal leaders, environmental experts, and municipal representatives—to build mutual understanding and help de-escalate tensions.
4. Conducting an independent Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) and sharing findings transparently with both sides to facilitate evidence-based decision-making.
Which of the statements given above would contribute to the resolution process?
- A1, 3 and 4 onlyCorrect
- B2, 3 and 4 only
- C1 and 2 only
- D1, 2, 3 and 4
Explanation
UPSC provisional key: (A), Series A question 52. Statements 1, 3 and 4 support mediation: acknowledge the community’s cultural concerns, include affected groups and experts, and share independent impact evidence. They address both recognition and practical evaluation of alternatives. Statement 2 dismisses one group’s rights and concerns before that process, making a durable settlement less likely.
Sources: UPSC provisional answer key · UPSC CSE Preliminary Examination 2026 GS I question paper, scenario as printed
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option B
Dialogue and a transparent impact assessment in statements 3 and 4 are useful, but statement 2 undermines both by presuming that the project should proceed regardless of tribal concerns. Omitting statement 1 also removes the recognition needed to establish trust at the start of mediation.
- Option C
Statement 1 helps build trust, but statement 2 prejudges the outcome and treats cultural concerns as automatically inferior. This option also omits the inclusive dialogue and independent impact assessment needed to compare feasible alternatives.
- Option D
Statement 2 makes this combination unsuitable. Urgent public-health needs must be addressed, but simply overriding the affected community is inconsistent with the question’s mandate to mediate a sustainable balance of environmental needs, tribal rights and urban health.
Q6Polity & Governance·Parliament and State LegislaturesPYQ 2026
Consider the following statements in respect of questions asked by the Members in the Parliament of India:
1. Unstarred questions are those to which a Member desires an oral answer in the House.
2. Starred questions are those to which a Member desires a written answer.
3. No supplementary question can be asked on an unstarred question.
Which one of the following conclusions based on the above statements is correct?
- AAll the three statements are correct.
- BThere are two correct statements, that include statement 2.
- CThere is only one correct statement.Correct
- DThere is no correct statement.
Explanation
UPSC provisional key: (C), Series A question 58. Only statement 3 is correct. Unstarred questions are answered in writing and do not permit supplementary questions; starred questions are listed for oral answers. The question tests the reversal of the first two definitions, not a restriction on all parliamentary follow-up.
Sources: UPSC provisional answer key · Lok Sabha: Frequently asked questions on question procedure
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
The first two statements interchange the categories. Starred questions seek oral answers and may lead to supplementary questions; unstarred questions receive written answers without supplementaries. Only statement 3 is correct.
- Option B
Statement 2 is false because a starred question seeks an oral answer. Statement 1 is also false, so there cannot be two correct statements including statement 2; the only correct one is statement 3.
- Option D
Statement 3 is correct, so rejecting every statement is wrong. The absence of supplementaries attaches to unstarred questions; starred questions provide the oral-answer procedure in which supplementaries may be asked.
Q7Polity & Governance·Fundamental RightsPYQ 2026
‘X’ was addressing a seminar on the meaning of the term ‘law’ as provided under Article 13, Part III of the Constitution of India. ‘X’ explained that the meaning of the term ‘law’ in the Constitution of India was very comprehensive. It included ordinances, orders and even rules and regulations. ‘Y’ pointed out that the term ‘law’ in Article 13 also included custom or usage having in the territory of India the force of law, to which ‘X’ was not convinced. Based on the above, select the correct conclusion from the options given below:
- A‘X’ is correct in the interpretation of law, including the view on non-inclusion of custom.
- BThe view of ‘Y’ that ‘law’ included custom is not correct.
- CThe views of both ‘X’ and ‘Y’ are correct.
- DThe view of only ‘Y’ is correct.Correct
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
X is right that ordinances, orders, rules and regulations can fall within Article 13, but wrong to exclude every custom. Article 13(3)(a) expressly also covers custom or usage having the force of law, so this option wrongly endorses X’s complete interpretation.
- Option B
Y’s point follows the express text of Article 13(3)(a). The qualification matters: the provision covers custom or usage having the force of law, not every social habit or personal preference.
- Option C
The speakers agree on part of the definition, but X rejects an element expressly included in Article 13. Therefore both complete positions cannot be correct: Y correctly identifies legally operative custom or usage.
Q8Polity & Governance·Non-Constitutional BodiesPYQ 2026
With reference to the organisations under the Government of India, consider the following details:
1. Organisation: Central Economic Intelligence Bureau (CEIB); Function: To coordinate between various law enforcement agencies; Controlling Union Ministry: Ministry of Home Affairs
2. Organisation: Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO); Function: To investigate complex corporate frauds; Controlling Union Ministry: Ministry of Finance
3. Organisation: Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI); Function: To preserve values in public life and ensure the health of the national economy; Controlling Union Ministry: Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension
In how many of the above rows are the given details correctly matched?
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option B
Two rows cannot be correct because both rows 1 and 2 assign the wrong controlling ministry. CEIB belongs to Finance and SFIO to Corporate Affairs; only the CBI row survives the complete-row test.
- Option C
The first two functions sound appropriate, but each row must also have the correct ministry. CEIB is not under Home Affairs and SFIO is not under Finance, leaving only one fully correct row.
- Option D
Row 3 is correctly matched, so “None” is not correct. The question is designed to distinguish economic subject matter from administrative control: an agency investigating financial wrongdoing need not belong to the Finance Ministry.
Q9Polity & Governance·Federalism and Local GovernancePYQ 2026
Which of the following statements with respect to the Revamped Rashtriya Gram Swaraj Abhiyan (RGSA) is/are correct?
1. The period of its implementation is 1st April, 2021 to 31st March, 2026.
2. The key objective of the Revamped RGSA is to develop the governance capabilities of the Panchayati Raj Institutions to deliver on the Sustainable Development Goals.
3. The share of the Central funding for the Revamped RGSA is 100% for all States and Union Territories.
Select the answer using the code given below:
- A1 and 2
- B2 onlyCorrect
- C1 and 3
- D2 and 3
Explanation
UPSC provisional key: (B), Series A question 74. Only statement 2 is correct: the revamped RGSA strengthens Panchayati Raj Institutions to pursue the Sustainable Development Goals. Its approved period began on 1 April 2022; state-component funding is generally shared 60:40, with 90:10 for specified northeastern/hill jurisdictions and J&K, rather than universal 100% central financing.
Sources: UPSC provisional answer key · Cabinet approval of revamped RGSA, 13 April 2022
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
The governance-capacity objective is correct, but the stated commencement year is wrong. The revamped scheme was approved for 1 April 2022–31 March 2026, rather than beginning on 1 April 2021.
- Option C
Both statements included here are incorrect. The revamped period starts in 2022, and central funding varies by component and jurisdiction instead of covering the entire cost for every state and Union Territory.
- Option D
Statement 2 correctly describes the programme’s purpose, but statement 3 overgeneralises the full central funding applicable to central components and Union Territories other than J&K. For ordinary state components, the scheme uses Centre–state cost sharing.
Q10Polity & Governance·Making of the ConstitutionPYQ 2026
Consider the following statements with reference to the Constitution of India:
1. There is no Article in the Constitution of India that specifies that the Constitution of India will be officially called the ‘Constitution of India’.
2. There is no Article in the Constitution of India that specifies that the Indian Independence Act, 1947 and the Government of India Act, 1935 stand repealed.
3. There is no Article in the Constitution of India that mentions 26th January, 1950 as the date of the commencement of the Constitution of India.
Which one of the following conclusions based on the above statements is correct?
- AAll three statements are correct.
- BThere is no correct statement.Correct
- CThere are two correct statements that include statement 3.
- DThere is only one correct statement.
Explanation
UPSC provisional key: (B), Series A question 55. None of the three statements is correct. Article 393 provides the title; Article 395 repeals the Indian Independence Act, 1947 and Government of India Act, 1935; and Article 394 brings the remaining provisions into force on 26 January 1950 after specified provisions commenced immediately. Remember the sequence: title, commencement, repeals.
Sources: UPSC provisional answer key · India Code: Constitution of India, Articles 13, 243D, 244 and 393–395
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Each statement denies an express constitutional provision. Article 393 supplies the short title, Article 395 repeals the named predecessor Acts, and Article 394 specifies the commencement arrangement including 26 January 1950.
- Option C
Statement 3 is false because Article 394 explicitly gives 26 January 1950 for commencement of the remaining provisions. Statements 1 and 2 are also false, since Articles 393 and 395 respectively address the title and repeals.
- Option D
There is no single correct statement: all three are contradicted by Part XXII. The immediate commencement of some provisions does not remove Article 394’s express date for commencement of the rest.
Q11Polity & Governance·Important Acts and Rights-Based GovernancePYQ 2026
Which of the following statements with regard to the persons with disabilities in India is/are correct?
1. The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, an Act passed by the Parliament of India in 2018, mandates reservation in education and employment, places a legal duty on Governments to ensure accessibility and non-discrimination.
2. The Sugamya Bharat Abhiyan focuses on achieving universal accessibility for Persons with Disabilities across three key domains — built infrastructure, transport systems and information and communication technology.
3. The National Divyangjan Finance and Development Corporation (NDFDC) is a public sector organisation set up by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs as a not-for-profit company to promote entrepreneurship among Persons with Disabilities (PwDs).
Select the answer using the code given below:
- A1 and 2
- B2 onlyCorrect
- C1 and 3
- D1 only
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Statement 2 correctly identifies the campaign’s three accessibility domains, but statement 1 gives the wrong enactment year. The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act is the 2016 Act, so an otherwise plausible description of its protections does not make the whole statement correct.
- Option C
Both selected statements contain factual errors. Statement 1 misdates the Act, while statement 3 confuses incorporation under company law with the ministry responsible for the corporation. A company-law framework does not imply administrative control by the Corporate Affairs Ministry.
- Option D
Statement 1 is invalid because the Act was enacted in 2016, not 2018. This is a date trap: the broadly correct references to reservation, accessibility and non-discrimination do not cure the incorrect year.
Q12Polity & Governance·Parliament and State LegislaturesPYQ 2026
Consider the following statements about the Committee on the Welfare of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes of the Parliament of India:
1. Although members of this Committee are elected from both Houses of Parliament, the Chairperson of this Committee is appointed by the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha.
2. Twenty members are elected by the Rajya Sabha and ten members by the Lok Sabha.
3. No Minister, except for the Union Minister of Social Justice and Empowerment, is eligible to be a member of this Committee.
4. Members are elected for a fixed term of two years from the date they enter their office.
Which one of the following conclusions based on the above statements is correct?
- AThere are four correct statements.
- BThere is only one correct statement, that is statement 2.
- CThere are two correct statements, that include statement 1.
- DThere is no correct statement.Correct
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
All four statements contain errors. The Speaker appoints the chair, the 30 members comprise 20 from Lok Sabha and 10 from Rajya Sabha, ministers are ineligible without the suggested exception, and the committee’s term does not exceed one year.
- Option B
Statement 2 reverses the distribution between the Houses. Lok Sabha elects 20 members and Rajya Sabha 10, so it cannot be the one correct statement. The remaining statements also misstate the appointment, ministerial eligibility and tenure rules.
- Option C
Statement 1 is false because the Speaker, not the Rajya Sabha Chairman, appoints the committee’s chairperson. None of the other statements supplies a second correct item: their membership numbers, ministerial exception and two-year term are also wrong.
Q13Polity & Governance·Non-Constitutional BodiesPYQ 2025
With reference to the Government of India, consider the following information:
I. Directorate of Enforcement — Enforcement of the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 — Internal Security Division-I, Ministry of Home Affairs
II. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence — Enforces the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 — Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance
III. Directorate General of Systems and Data Management — Carries out big data analytics to assist tax officers and detect tax evasion — Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance
In how many of the above rows is the information correctly matched?
- AOnly one
- BOnly twoCorrect
- CAll the three
- DNone
Explanation
Correct. The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence functions under the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, and the DGSM also falls under the Department of Revenue. The mismatch lies in the Directorate of Enforcement row — while it enforces the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, it works under the Department of Revenue, not the Internal Security Division-I of the Ministry of Home Affairs.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Two rows are correctly matched, not just one. Both DRI and DGSM are correctly described.
- Option C
Not all three are correct. The Directorate of Enforcement is placed under the wrong ministry — it operates under the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, not MHA.
- Option D
Two of the three rows are correctly matched. The DRI and DGSM descriptions are accurate.
Q14Polity & Governance·State ExecutivePYQ 2025
With reference to the Indian polity, consider the following statements:
Statement I: The Governor of a State is not answerable to any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of office.
Statement II: No criminal proceedings shall be instituted or continued against the Governor during the term of office.
Statement III: Members of a State Legislature are not liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything said within the House.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
- AI and II only
- BII and III only
- CI and III only
- DI, II and IIICorrect
Explanation
Correct. Article 361 protects the Governor from being answerable to courts for official acts (Statement I) and bars criminal proceedings during the term of office (Statement II). Article 194 provides legislative privilege to members for anything said in the House (Statement III).
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Incomplete. Statement III is also correct. Members of a State Legislature enjoy parliamentary privilege under Article 194 for anything said in the House.
- Option B
Incomplete. Statement I is also correct. Article 361(1) provides that the Governor is not answerable to any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of office.
- Option C
Incomplete. Statement II is also correct. Article 361(2) bars criminal proceedings against the Governor during the term of office.
Q15Polity & Governance·State ExecutivePYQ 2025
Consider the following statements:
Statement I: The Constitution of India explicitly mentions that in certain spheres the Governor of a State acts in his or her own discretion.
Statement II: The President of India can, on his or her own, reserve a bill passed by a State Legislature for consideration without it being forwarded by the Governor of the State concerned.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- AStatement I onlyCorrect
- BStatement II only
- CBoth Statement I and Statement II
- DNeither Statement I nor Statement II
Explanation
Correct. Article 163(1) explicitly mentions that the Governor shall act in his discretion in matters where the Constitution requires him to do so. Statement II is wrong because the President cannot directly reserve a State bill; only the Governor can reserve a bill under Article 200.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option B
Incorrect. Statement II is wrong. The President has no independent power to reserve a State bill. A bill reaches the President for consideration only when the Governor reserves it under Article 200.
- Option C
Incorrect. Only Statement I is correct. The Constitution does explicitly provide for discretionary powers of the Governor, but the President cannot bypass the Governor to reserve a State bill.
- Option D
Incorrect. Statement I is correct. Article 163 of the Constitution expressly mentions the Governor acting in discretion in certain specified situations.
Q16Polity & Governance·Constitutional BodiesPYQ 2025
Which of the following statements with regard to recommendations of the 15th Finance Commission of India are correct?
Statement I: It recommended grants of Rs. 4,800 crores from 2022-23 to 2025-26 for incentivizing States to enhance educational outcomes.
Statement II: Forty-five percent of the net proceeds of Union taxes are to be shared with States.
Statement III: Rs. 45,000 crores are to be kept as performance-based incentive for all States for carrying out agricultural reforms.
Statement IV: It reintroduced tax effort criteria to reward fiscal performance.
- AI, II and III
- BI, II and IV
- CI, III and IVCorrect
- DII, III and IV
Explanation
Correct. The 15th FC recommended education-outcome grants, performance-based incentives for agricultural reforms, and reintroduced the tax effort criterion. Statement II is wrong because the recommended share was 41 percent, not 45 percent.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Statement II is incorrect. The 15th FC recommended that 41 percent, not 45 percent, of the divisible pool of Union taxes be shared with States.
- Option B
Statement II is incorrect. The vertical devolution share recommended by the 15th FC was 41 percent, not 45 percent.
- Option D
Statement II is incorrect. The 15th Finance Commission recommended 41 percent as the States' share in the divisible pool, not 45 percent.
Q17Polity & Governance·Non-Constitutional BodiesPYQ 2025
Consider the following statements about Lokpal:
Statement I: The power of Lokpal applies to public servants of India, but not to Indian public servants posted outside India.
Statement II: The Chairperson or a Member shall not be a Member of Parliament or of the Legislature of any State or Union Territory, and only the Chief Justice of India, whether incumbent or retired, has to be its Chairperson.
Statement III: The Chairperson or a Member shall not be a person of less than forty-five years of age on the date of assuming office.
Statement IV: Lokpal cannot inquire into allegations of corruption against a sitting Prime Minister of India.
- AIII onlyCorrect
- BII and III
- CI and IV
- DNone of the above statements is correct
Explanation
Correct. Only Statement III is correct. The minimum age requirement of 45 years for the Chairperson or a Member of Lokpal is accurately stated under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option B
Statement II is incorrect because the Chairperson need not be only the CJI — a former CJI, former Supreme Court judge, or eminent person can also qualify. Only Statement III about the age requirement is correct.
- Option C
Statement I is incorrect because the Lokpal's jurisdiction can extend to public servants outside India. Statement IV is incorrect because the Lokpal can inquire into allegations against a sitting Prime Minister subject to certain statutory safeguards.
- Option D
Statement III is correct — the minimum age of 45 years is a valid statutory requirement under the 2013 Act.
Q18Polity & Governance·Union ExecutivePYQ 2025
With reference to the Indian polity, consider the following statements:
Statement I: An Ordinance can amend any Central Act.
Statement II: An Ordinance can abridge a Fundamental Right.
Statement III: An Ordinance can come into effect from a back date.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
- AI and II only
- BII and III only
- CI and III onlyCorrect
- DI, II and III
Explanation
Correct. An ordinance has the same force and effect as an Act of Parliament, so it can amend an existing Central Act (Statement I correct). It may also be given retrospective effect, i.e., come into effect from a back date (Statement III correct). However, Statement II is wrong because the ordinance power is subject to the Constitution and cannot abridge Fundamental Rights.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Statement II is incorrect. An ordinance is subject to the same constitutional limitations as an Act of Parliament and cannot abridge Fundamental Rights.
- Option B
Statement II is incorrect. Just as Parliament cannot enact a law that abridges Fundamental Rights, an ordinance also cannot validly abridge them.
- Option D
Statement II is incorrect. The ordinance power under Article 123 is subject to the Constitution. Just as Parliament cannot pass a law violating Fundamental Rights, an ordinance also cannot abridge them.
Q19Polity & Governance·Parliament and State LegislaturesPYQ 2025
Consider the following statements:
Statement I: On the dissolution of the House of the People, the Speaker shall not vacate office until immediately before the first meeting of the House of the People after the dissolution.
Statement II: According to the Constitution of India, a Member of the House of the People on being elected as Speaker shall resign from the political party immediately.
Statement III: The Speaker of the House of the People may be removed by a resolution of the House passed by a majority of all the then Members of the House, provided that at least fourteen days' notice has been given.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- AI and II only
- BII and III only
- CI and III onlyCorrect
- DI, II and III
Explanation
Correct. The Speaker continues in office after dissolution until immediately before the first meeting of the next Lok Sabha (Statement I, Article 94). There is no constitutional requirement to resign from the party (Statement II is false). The Speaker can be removed by a resolution passed by a majority of all the then members after 14 days' notice (Statement III, Article 94).
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Statement II is incorrect. There is no constitutional requirement that the Speaker resign from the political party upon election to the office.
- Option B
Statement II is incorrect. The Constitution does not mandate that the Speaker resign from the party.
- Option D
Statement II is false. No such constitutional provision exists requiring the Speaker to resign from the party.
Q20Polity & Governance·Federalism and Local GovernancePYQ 2025
With reference to India, consider the following:
I. Inter-State Council
II. National Security Council
III. Zonal Councils
How many of the above were established as per the provisions of the Constitution of India?
- AOnly oneCorrect
- BOnly two
- CAll the three
- DNone
Explanation
Correct. Only the Inter-State Council is a constitutional body, established under Article 263. The National Security Council is an executive body created by a government order, and Zonal Councils were created by the States Reorganisation Act, 1956.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option B
Only one of the three is a constitutional body. The National Security Council is not mentioned in the Constitution, and Zonal Councils derive from a statute, not the Constitution.
- Option C
All three were not established by the Constitution. Only the Inter-State Council has a direct constitutional basis under Article 263.
- Option D
This is incorrect because the Inter-State Council is specifically provided for under Article 263 of the Constitution, making at least one of the three a constitutional creation.
Q21Polity & Governance·DPSPs and Fundamental DutiesPYQ 2025
Consider the following pairs:
I. Separation of judiciary from the executive in the public services of the State — Directive Principles of State Policy
II. Valuing and preserving the rich heritage of our composite culture — Fundamental Duties
III. Prohibition of employment of children below the age of 14 years in factories — Fundamental Rights
How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?
- AOnly one
- BOnly two
- CAll the threeCorrect
- DNone
Explanation
Correct. Separation of judiciary from executive is a DPSP under Article 50, valuing and preserving composite culture is a Fundamental Duty under Article 51A(f), and prohibition of employment of children below 14 in factories is a Fundamental Right under Article 24.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
All three pairs are correctly matched, not just one. Each provision is correctly placed in its constitutional category.
- Option B
All three pairs are correctly matched, not just two. Article 50 (DPSP), Article 51A(f) (Fundamental Duty), and Article 24 (Fundamental Right) all correspond correctly.
- Option D
All three pairs are correctly matched. Article 50 enjoins separation of judiciary from executive as a DPSP, Article 51A(f) lists preserving composite culture as a Fundamental Duty, and Article 24 prohibits child labour in factories as a Fundamental Right.
Q22Polity & Governance·Emergency Provisions and Amendment ProcessPYQ 2025
With reference to the Constitution of India, if an area in a State is declared as Scheduled Area under the Fifth Schedule, consider the following statements:
Statement I: The State Government loses its executive power in such areas and a local body assumes total administration.
Statement II: The Union Government can take over the total administration of such areas under certain circumstances on the recommendations of the Governor.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- AStatement I only
- BStatement II only
- CBoth Statement I and Statement II
- DNeither Statement I nor Statement IICorrect
Explanation
Correct. Statement I is incorrect because the State Government does not lose executive power. Statement II is incorrect because the Fifth Schedule does not provide for Union takeover of total administration on gubernatorial recommendation.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Incorrect. Statement I is wrong because declaration of a Scheduled Area does not strip the State Government of its executive power or transfer total administration to a local body. The State retains executive power with some special gubernatorial oversight.
- Option B
Incorrect. Statement II is wrong because while the Fifth Schedule gives the Governor special responsibilities and allows the Union to issue directions to States, it does not create a mechanism for the Union to take over total administration on the Governor's recommendation.
- Option C
Incorrect. Both statements are wrong. The Fifth Schedule provides for special regulatory powers of the Governor and a Tribes Advisory Council, but neither strips the State of executive power nor allows Union takeover of total administration.
Q23Polity & Governance·Elections and Political DynamicsPYQ 2025
Consider the following statements:
Statement I: If any question arises as to whether a Member of the House of the People has become subject to disqualification under the Tenth Schedule, the President's decision in accordance with the opinion of the Council of Union Ministers shall be final.
Statement II: There is no mention of the word 'political party' in the Constitution of India.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- AI only
- BII only
- CBoth I and II
- DNeither I nor IICorrect
Explanation
Correct. Statement I is wrong because the Speaker or Chairman decides defection cases, not the President. Statement II is wrong because the Tenth Schedule expressly uses the term 'political party'.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Incorrect. Disqualification questions under the Tenth Schedule are decided by the Speaker or Chairman of the House concerned, not by the President on ministerial advice.
- Option B
Incorrect. The expression 'political party' does appear in the Constitution, specifically in the Tenth Schedule dealing with anti-defection.
- Option C
Incorrect. Both statements are factually wrong — the Speaker decides Tenth Schedule questions, and 'political party' is mentioned in the Constitution.
Q24Polity & Governance·Federalism and Local GovernancePYQ 2025
Consider the following statements:
Statement I: Panchayats at the intermediate level exist in all States.
Statement II: To be eligible to be a Member of a Panchayat at the intermediate level, a person should attain the age of thirty years.
Statement III: The Chief Minister of a State constitutes a commission to review the financial position of Panchayats and to make recommendations regarding distribution of State taxes and duties between the State and Panchayats.
- AI and II only
- BII and III only
- CI and III only
- DI, II and IIICorrect
Explanation
Correct per the official answer key. However, constitutionally: intermediate-level Panchayats are not mandatory in States with populations below 20 lakh; the minimum age is 21 years not 30; and the State Finance Commission is constituted by the Governor, not the Chief Minister. The PYQ answer key uses (d) as the correct option.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
This selects only two statements, but the accepted answer key marks all three statements as the answer. The question tests whether candidates can identify that none of the three statements is constitutionally accurate.
- Option B
This selects only two statements. The accepted answer key for this PYQ is option (d), though all three statements contain inaccuracies in constitutional terms.
- Option C
This selects only two statements. The accepted answer is (d) per the official key.
Q25Polity & Governance·Union ExecutivePYQ 2025
Consider the following statements with regard to the pardoning power of the President of India:
Statement I: The exercise of this power by the President can be subjected to limited judicial review.
Statement II: The President can exercise this power without the advice of the Central Government.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
- AStatement I is correct but Statement II is incorrectCorrect
- BStatement II is correct but Statement I is incorrect
- CBoth Statements I and II are correct
- DNeither Statement I nor Statement II is correct
Explanation
Correct. Statement I is correct because the Supreme Court in Maru Ram v. Union of India and Epuru Sudhakar v. Government of Andhra Pradesh recognized limited judicial review of the pardoning power on grounds of mala fides, arbitrariness, or non-application of mind. Statement II is wrong because the President exercises pardon power under Article 72 on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option B
Statement II is incorrect. The President cannot exercise the pardoning power independently without ministerial advice, as Article 74(1) mandates that the President acts on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers.
- Option C
Statement II is incorrect. The President must act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers under Article 74(1) when exercising the pardoning power.
- Option D
Statement I is correct. Courts have upheld limited judicial review of the President's pardoning power in landmark cases.