12 sample questions are shown here; sign up free to practise all 81.
Q1Polity & Governance·Fundamental RightsPYQ 2026
‘X’ was addressing a seminar on the meaning of the term ‘law’ as provided under Article 13, Part III of the Constitution of India. ‘X’ explained that the meaning of the term ‘law’ in the Constitution of India was very comprehensive. It included ordinances, orders and even rules and regulations. ‘Y’ pointed out that the term ‘law’ in Article 13 also included custom or usage having in the territory of India the force of law, to which ‘X’ was not convinced. Based on the above, select the correct conclusion from the options given below:
- A‘X’ is correct in the interpretation of law, including the view on non-inclusion of custom.
- BThe view of ‘Y’ that ‘law’ included custom is not correct.
- CThe views of both ‘X’ and ‘Y’ are correct.
- DThe view of only ‘Y’ is correct.Correct
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
X is right that ordinances, orders, rules and regulations can fall within Article 13, but wrong to exclude every custom. Article 13(3)(a) expressly also covers custom or usage having the force of law, so this option wrongly endorses X’s complete interpretation.
- Option B
Y’s point follows the express text of Article 13(3)(a). The qualification matters: the provision covers custom or usage having the force of law, not every social habit or personal preference.
- Option C
The speakers agree on part of the definition, but X rejects an element expressly included in Article 13. Therefore both complete positions cannot be correct: Y correctly identifies legally operative custom or usage.
Q2Polity & Governance·Fundamental RightsPYQ 2024
Under which of the following Articles of the Constitution of India, has the Supreme Court of India placed the Right to Privacy?
- AArticle 15
- BArticle 16
- CArticle 19
- DArticle 21Correct
Explanation
Correct. In Justice K. S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017), a nine-judge bench unanimously held that the right to privacy is a constitutionally protected right under Article 21, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Incorrect. Article 15 prohibits discrimination on specified grounds. While it has a tangential connection to privacy, the Court did not ground the right to privacy primarily in this Article.
- Option B
Incorrect. Article 16 deals with equality of opportunity in public employment and is not the constitutional basis for the right to privacy.
- Option C
Incorrect. While Article 19 freedoms support privacy indirectly, the nine-judge bench in Puttaswamy rooted the right to privacy primarily in Article 21.
Q3Polity & Governance·Fundamental RightsPYQ 2023
Consider the following statements:
Statement I: The Supreme Court of India has held in some judgments that reservation policies under Article 16(4) would be limited by Article 335 for maintenance of efficiency of administration.
Statement II: Article 335 of the Constitution of India defines the term 'efficiency of administration.'
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
- ABoth Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement II is the correct explanation for Statement I
- BBoth Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement II is not the correct explanation for Statement I
- CStatement I is correct but Statement II is incorrectCorrect
- DStatement I is incorrect but Statement II is correct
Explanation
Correct. The Supreme Court has treated Article 335 as a limiting consideration on reservation under Article 16(4), requiring that claims of SCs and STs be consistent with maintenance of efficiency. However, Article 335 does not define 'efficiency of administration.'
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Incorrect. Statement II is false because Article 335 does not define 'efficiency of administration'; it only uses the term without providing a definition.
- Option B
Incorrect. Statement II is false. Article 335 mentions the consideration of efficiency but does not define the term.
- Option D
Incorrect. Statement I is correct as confirmed by Supreme Court judgments. Statement II is incorrect because Article 335 does not contain a definition of 'efficiency of administration.'
Q4Polity & Governance·Fundamental RightsPYQ 2021
"Right to Privacy" is protected under which Article of the Constitution of India?
- AArticle 15
- BArticle 19
- CArticle 21Correct
- DArticle 29
Explanation
Correct. In Justice K. S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017), the Supreme Court held that the right to privacy is protected as a fundamental right under Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty).
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Incorrect. Article 15 prohibits discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. It is not the primary constitutional basis for the right to privacy.
- Option B
Incorrect. While Article 19 freedoms have a peripheral connection to privacy, the Supreme Court in Puttaswamy grounded the right to privacy primarily in Article 21.
- Option D
Incorrect. Article 29 deals with the protection of interests of minorities, not with the right to privacy.
Q5Polity & Governance·Fundamental RightsPYQ 2021
A legislation which confers on the executive or administrative authority an unguided and uncontrolled discretionary power in the matter of application of law violates which one of the following Articles of the Constitution of India?
- AArticle 14Correct
- BArticle 28
- CArticle 32
- DArticle 44
Explanation
Correct. Article 14 guarantees equality before law and equal protection of laws. The Supreme Court has held that arbitrary and unguided executive discretion violates the non-arbitrariness doctrine inherent in Article 14.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option B
Incorrect. Article 28 deals with freedom from attending religious instruction or worship in certain educational institutions, not with executive discretion.
- Option C
Incorrect. Article 32 provides for the right to move the Supreme Court for enforcement of fundamental rights. It is a remedial provision, not one that is directly violated by unguided discretion.
- Option D
Incorrect. Article 44 is a Directive Principle directing the State to secure a Uniform Civil Code. It has nothing to do with unguided administrative discretion.
Q6Polity & Governance·Fundamental RightsPYQ 2021
What is the position of the Right to Property in India?
- ALegal right available to citizens only
- BLegal right available to any personCorrect
- CFundamental Right available to citizens only
- DNeither Fundamental Right nor legal right
Explanation
Correct. After the 44th Amendment removed it from Part III, the right to property is a constitutional legal right under Article 300A, available to any person — not limited to citizens.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Incorrect. Article 300A uses the word 'person,' not 'citizen.' The protection extends to all persons, including non-citizens.
- Option C
Incorrect. The right to property ceased to be a Fundamental Right after the 44th Amendment (1978). It is no longer in Part III of the Constitution.
- Option D
Incorrect. While no longer a fundamental right, it is still a constitutional and legal right under Article 300A.
Q7Polity & Governance·Fundamental RightsPYQ 2020
Which one of the following categories of Fundamental Rights incorporates protection against untouchability as a form of discrimination?
- ARight against Exploitation
- BRight to Freedom
- CRight to Constitutional Remedies
- DRight to EqualityCorrect
Explanation
Correct. Article 17, which abolishes untouchability, falls within the Right to Equality (Articles 14-18). Untouchability is treated as a form of discrimination prohibited under the equality code.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Incorrect. The Right against Exploitation (Articles 23-24) deals with trafficking, forced labour, and child labour, not untouchability.
- Option B
Incorrect. The Right to Freedom (Articles 19-22) deals with personal freedoms, protection against conviction, and life and liberty, not untouchability.
- Option C
Incorrect. The Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32) deals with enforcement of fundamental rights through the Supreme Court, not specifically with untouchability.
Q8Polity & Governance·Fundamental RightsPYQ 2019
Which Article of the Constitution of India safeguards one's right to marry the person of one's choice?
- AArticle 19
- BArticle 21Correct
- CArticle 25
- DArticle 29
Explanation
Correct. The Supreme Court has held that the right to marry a person of one's choice is part of personal liberty, dignity, and autonomy under Article 21.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Incorrect. Article 19 deals with six freedoms including speech, assembly, and movement but does not specifically protect the right to choose a marriage partner.
- Option C
Incorrect. Article 25 deals with freedom of conscience and the right to profess, practise, and propagate religion, not specifically the right to marry.
- Option D
Incorrect. Article 29 deals with the protection of interests of minorities and conservation of their language, script, and culture.
Q9Polity & Governance·Fundamental RightsPYQ 2018
Right to Privacy is protected as an intrinsic part of Right to Life and Personal Liberty. Which of the following in the Constitution of India correctly and appropriately imply the above statement?
- AArticle 14 and the provisions under the 42nd Amendment to the Constitution
- BArticle 17 and the Directive Principles of State Policy in Part IV
- CArticle 21 and the freedom guaranteed in Part IIICorrect
- DArticle 24 and the provisions under the 44th Amendment to the Constitution
Explanation
Correct. In Justice K. S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017), the Supreme Court held privacy to be intrinsic to life and personal liberty under Article 21, read with the freedoms guaranteed under Part III of the Constitution.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Incorrect. Article 14 deals with equality, and the 42nd Amendment largely concerns Directive Principles and Fundamental Duties. Neither captures the constitutional basis of the right to privacy.
- Option B
Incorrect. Article 17 abolishes untouchability and the DPSPs in Part IV are non-justiciable. Neither is the basis for the right to privacy.
- Option D
Incorrect. Article 24 prohibits child labour, and the 44th Amendment primarily dealt with the right to property and emergency provisions. Neither is the basis for the right to privacy.
Q10Polity & Governance·Fundamental RightsPYQ 2017
Which of the following are envisaged by the Right against Exploitation in the Constitution of India?
1. Prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labour
2. Abolition of untouchability
3. Protection of the interests of minorities
4. Prohibition of employment of children in factories and mines
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
- A1, 2 and 4 only
- B2, 3 and 4 only
- C1 and 4 onlyCorrect
- D1, 2, 3 and 4
Explanation
Correct. The Right against Exploitation comprises Article 23 (prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labour) and Article 24 (prohibition of child labour in hazardous employment). Untouchability and minority rights belong to other categories.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Incorrect. Abolition of untouchability (Statement 2) falls under the Right to Equality (Article 17), not the Right against Exploitation.
- Option B
Incorrect. Neither abolition of untouchability (Article 17, Right to Equality) nor protection of minorities (Articles 29-30, Cultural and Educational Rights) falls under the Right against Exploitation.
- Option D
Incorrect. Only Statements 1 and 4 belong to the Right against Exploitation. Untouchability abolition is under Right to Equality, and minority protection is under Cultural and Educational Rights.
Q11Polity & Governance·Fundamental RightsPYQ 2011
Consider the following:
1. Right to education
2. Right to equal access to public service
3. Right to food
Which of the above is/are human rights under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights?
- A1 only
- B1 and 2 only
- C3 only
- D1, 2 and 3Correct
Explanation
Correct. The UDHR includes the right to education (Article 26), the right to equal access to public service (Article 21), and the right to an adequate standard of living encompassing food (Article 25).
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Incomplete. The UDHR also covers the right to equal access to public service (Article 21) and the right to an adequate standard of living including food (Article 25).
- Option B
Incomplete. The right to food is also covered under the UDHR as part of the right to an adequate standard of living under Article 25.
- Option C
Incomplete. The UDHR also covers education (Article 26) and equal access to public service (Article 21).
Q12Polity & Governance·Fundamental RightsPYQ 2011
In India, if a religious sect/community is given the status of a national minority, what special advantages is it entitled to?
1. It can establish and administer exclusive educational institutions.
2. The President of India automatically nominates a representative of the community to the Lok Sabha.
3. It can derive benefits from the Prime Minister's 15-Point Programme.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A1 only
- B2 and 3 only
- C1 and 3 onlyCorrect
- D1, 2 and 3
Explanation
Correct. Under Article 30, minorities can establish and administer educational institutions. They can also benefit from the PM's 15-Point Programme. There is no automatic Lok Sabha nomination for minority representatives.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Incomplete. Statement 3 is also correct because minorities can benefit from the Prime Minister's 15-Point Programme for the welfare of minorities.
- Option B
Incorrect. Statement 2 is false because there is no constitutional provision for automatic nomination of a minority representative to the Lok Sabha. Statement 1 is also correct.
- Option D
Incorrect. Statement 2 is false. The Constitution does not provide for automatic nomination of minority community representatives to the Lok Sabha.