12 sample questions are shown here; sign up free to practise all 65.
Q1Polity & Governance·Historical Background
The Regulating Act of 1773 designated the Governor of Bengal as the 'Governor-General of Bengal.' Who was the first person to hold this office?
- ARobert Clive
- BWarren HastingsCorrect
- CLord Cornwallis
- DLord Wellesley
Explanation
Correct. Warren Hastings became the first Governor-General of Bengal in 1774 under the Regulating Act of 1773. He held office from 1774 to 1785 and was later impeached (though acquitted) by the British Parliament.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Robert Clive served as Governor of Bengal (1757–60 and 1765–67), before the Regulating Act was enacted. He was never designated Governor-General of Bengal.
- Option C
Lord Cornwallis was the second Governor-General of Bengal (1786–93). He is known for the Permanent Settlement of 1793 and the Cornwallis Code.
- Option D
Lord Wellesley served as Governor-General from 1798 to 1805. He is known for the policy of Subsidiary Alliance.
Q2Polity & Governance·Historical Background
Consider the following statements about the Charter Act of 1833:
1. It made the Governor-General of Bengal as the Governor-General of India.
2. It deprived the Governors of Bombay and Madras of their legislative powers.
3. It ended the commercial activities of the East India Company.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
- A1 and 2 only
- B2 and 3 only
- C1 and 3 only
- D1, 2 and 3Correct
Explanation
Correct. The Charter Act of 1833 re-designated the Governor-General of Bengal as the Governor-General of India (Lord William Bentinck was the first), stripped Bombay and Madras of legislative powers making the Governor-General the sole legislator, and ended the Company's commercial activities entirely.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
This is incomplete. Statement 3 is also correct — the Charter Act of 1833 made the Company a purely administrative body by ending all its commercial functions.
- Option B
This is incomplete. Statement 1 is also correct — William Bentinck became the first Governor-General of India under this Act.
- Option C
This is incomplete. Statement 2 is also correct — legislative powers were concentrated in the Governor-General in Council, depriving Bombay and Madras presidencies of their independent legislative authority.
Q3Polity & Governance·Historical Background
Which of the following provisions of the Government of India Act of 1935 were later incorporated into the Indian Constitution?
1. Federal scheme
2. Office of the Governor
3. Emergency provisions
4. Three-fold distribution of legislative powers
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
- A1, 2 and 3 only
- B2, 3 and 4 only
- C1, 3 and 4 only
- D1, 2, 3 and 4Correct
Explanation
Correct. The Government of India Act of 1935 is considered the main source of the Indian Constitution. The federal scheme, office of Governor, emergency provisions, and three-list distribution of legislative powers were all drawn from the 1935 Act and adapted for the Indian Constitution.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
This is incomplete. The three-fold distribution of legislative powers (Federal, Provincial, and Concurrent lists) from the 1935 Act was also adopted in the Indian Constitution (Union, State, and Concurrent lists).
- Option B
This is incomplete. The federal scheme of the 1935 Act influenced the Indian Constitution's federal structure, even though the exact provisions were modified.
- Option C
This is incomplete. The office of Governor, which was established under the 1935 Act for provinces, was retained in the Indian Constitution with modifications.
Q4Polity & Governance·Historical Background
The All-India Federation proposed by the Government of India Act of 1935 never came into existence because:
- AThe Indian National Congress rejected the federal scheme
- BThe Muslim League opposed the federation
- CThe Princely States refused to join the federationCorrect
- DThe British Parliament withdrew the proposal
Explanation
Correct. The All-India Federation under the 1935 Act required that the rulers of Princely States accounting for at least half the seats in the Council of State would voluntarily join. The Princely States, fearing loss of sovereignty, refused to sign the Instruments of Accession, and the federation never came into existence.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
While the Congress had reservations about the 1935 Act, the main reason the federation did not materialise was the refusal of the Princely States. The Congress actually formed ministries in provinces after the 1937 elections.
- Option B
The Muslim League was not the primary reason for the failure of the federation. The federation required the voluntary accession of Princely States, which was not forthcoming.
- Option D
The British Parliament did not withdraw the proposal. The legislation remained in force, but the precondition of Princely States joining voluntarily was never fulfilled.
Q5Polity & Governance·Historical Background
The first law member of the Governor-General's Council who was an Indian was:
- ASatyendra Prasad SinhaCorrect
- BB.R. Ambedkar
- CTej Bahadur Sapru
- DC. Rajagopalachari
Explanation
Correct. Satyendra Prasad Sinha (later Lord Sinha) became the first Indian to be appointed as a Law Member of the Viceroy's Executive Council in 1909 under the Indian Councils Act of 1909 (Morley-Minto Reforms).
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option B
B.R. Ambedkar was Law Minister in independent India's first cabinet (1947-51) and chairman of the Drafting Committee of the Constitution. He was not part of the Governor-General's Council during British rule in this capacity.
- Option C
Tej Bahadur Sapru was a prominent lawyer and liberal leader who participated in the Round Table Conferences. He was not the first Indian Law Member of the Governor-General's Council.
- Option D
C. Rajagopalachari was the last Governor-General of India (1948-50) and a prominent Congress leader, but he was not the first Indian Law Member of the Viceroy's Council.
Q6Polity & Governance·Historical Background
The Mountbatten Plan (June 3, 1947) included which of the following provisions?
1. The principle of partition of India was accepted.
2. A referendum would be held in the North-West Frontier Province.
3. Bengal and Punjab would be partitioned.
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
- A1 and 2 only
- B1 and 3 only
- C2 and 3 only
- D1, 2 and 3Correct
Explanation
Correct. The Mountbatten Plan accepted partition, provided for a referendum in NWFP (which voted to join Pakistan), and proposed the partition of Bengal and Punjab. These provisions were later given legal effect by the Indian Independence Act of 1947.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
This is incomplete. Statement 3 is also correct — the Mountbatten Plan provided for the partition of Bengal and Punjab based on the wishes of the people in the Muslim-majority and Hindu-majority districts.
- Option B
This is incomplete. Statement 2 is also correct — a referendum was to be held in the NWFP to decide whether it would join India or Pakistan, given that it had a Congress government but a Muslim-majority population.
- Option C
This is incomplete. Statement 1 is also correct — the Mountbatten Plan accepted the principle of partition as the basis for transfer of power.
Q7Polity & Governance·Historical Background
Pitt's India Act of 1784 established which of the following?
- AA Board of Control to supervise the East India Company's civil, military and revenue affairsCorrect
- BDirect Crown rule over India replacing the East India Company
- CProvincial autonomy in Indian provinces
- DA federal court to adjudicate disputes between provinces
Explanation
Correct. Pitt's India Act of 1784 established a Board of Control consisting of six members including the Chancellor of the Exchequer and a Secretary of State. This Board had the power to supervise and control the Company's civil, military, and revenue affairs in India.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option B
Direct Crown rule was established only after the Government of India Act, 1858 (also called the Act for the Good Government of India), following the Revolt of 1857.
- Option C
Provincial autonomy was introduced by the Government of India Act of 1935, not by Pitt's India Act of 1784.
- Option D
A Federal Court was established under the Government of India Act of 1935 and began functioning in 1937. No such institution was created by Pitt's India Act.
Q8Polity & Governance·Historical Background
Which Act made the Governor-General of Bengal the Governor-General of India for the first time?
- ARegulating Act of 1773
- BPitt's India Act of 1784
- CCharter Act of 1833Correct
- DGovernment of India Act of 1858
Explanation
Correct. The Charter Act of 1833 re-designated the Governor-General of Bengal as the Governor-General of India. Lord William Bentinck was the first Governor-General of India under this provision, reflecting the expansion of British control across the subcontinent.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
The Regulating Act of 1773 created the post of Governor-General of Bengal, not Governor-General of India. Warren Hastings held this office.
- Option B
Pitt's India Act of 1784 established the dual government system but did not change the title from Governor-General of Bengal to Governor-General of India.
- Option D
The Government of India Act of 1858 added the title of 'Viceroy' to the existing post of Governor-General of India. The designation 'Governor-General of India' itself was established by the 1833 Act.
Q9Polity & Governance·Historical Background
The Indian Councils Act of 1892 is significant because:
- AIt introduced separate electorates for Muslims
- BIt introduced the principle of election for the first time, though indirectCorrect
- CIt established provincial autonomy
- DIt granted universal adult suffrage
Explanation
Correct. The Indian Councils Act of 1892 introduced indirect elections for the first time, though the word 'election' was not used in the Act itself. It used the term 'recommendation' or 'nomination.' It also gave members the right to discuss the budget and address questions to the executive.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Separate electorates for Muslims were introduced by the Indian Councils Act of 1909 (Morley-Minto Reforms), not the 1892 Act.
- Option C
Provincial autonomy was introduced much later by the Government of India Act of 1935.
- Option D
Universal adult suffrage was introduced only after India's independence through the Constitution of India, 1950.
Q10Polity & Governance·Historical Background
The Government of India Act of 1858 created which of the following new posts?
- AGovernor-General of India
- BSecretary of State for IndiaCorrect
- CCommander-in-Chief of India
- DChief Justice of India
Explanation
Correct. The Government of India Act of 1858 created the post of Secretary of State for India, a member of the British Cabinet who was assisted by a 15-member Council of India. The Secretary of State was given complete authority and control over Indian administration.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
The post of Governor-General of India was created by the Charter Act of 1833, not the 1858 Act. The 1858 Act added the title of 'Viceroy' to the existing post of Governor-General.
- Option C
The post of Commander-in-Chief existed long before 1858 and was part of the military administration of the East India Company.
- Option D
The post of Chief Justice of India as a constitutional office was established much later. The Supreme Court at Calcutta under the Regulating Act had a Chief Justice, but a unified judicial head for all of India was a later development.
Q11Polity & Governance·Historical Background
Consider the following pairs:
Constitutional Development — Associated Viceroy/Governor-General
1. Indian Councils Act of 1861 — Lord Canning
2. Indian Councils Act of 1892 — Lord Lansdowne
3. Government of India Act of 1919 — Lord Chelmsford
Which of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?
- A1 and 2 only
- B2 and 3 only
- C1 and 3 only
- D1, 2 and 3Correct
Explanation
Correct. All three pairs are correctly matched. Lord Canning oversaw the 1861 Act, Lord Lansdowne the 1892 Act, and Lord Chelmsford the 1919 Act (Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms).
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
This is incomplete. Pair 3 is also correct — Lord Chelmsford was the Viceroy when the Government of India Act of 1919 (Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms) was enacted.
- Option B
This is incomplete. Pair 1 is also correct — Lord Canning was the first Viceroy and was in office when the Indian Councils Act of 1861 was passed. He also introduced the portfolio system.
- Option C
This is incomplete. Pair 2 is also correct — Lord Lansdowne was the Viceroy of India (1888-1894) during the passage of the Indian Councils Act of 1892.
Q12Polity & Governance·Historical Background
Consider the following statements about separate electorates in British India:
1. Separate electorates were first introduced for Muslims by the Indian Councils Act of 1909.
2. The Government of India Act of 1919 extended separate electorates to Sikhs and Anglo-Indians.
3. The Communal Award of 1932 extended separate electorates to the Depressed Classes.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
- A1 and 2 only
- B1 and 3 only
- C2 and 3 only
- D1, 2 and 3Correct
Explanation
Correct. Separate electorates evolved through multiple stages: first for Muslims (1909), then extended to Sikhs, Anglo-Indians, and others (1919), and finally to the Depressed Classes through the Communal Award (1932), which was later modified by the Poona Pact.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
This is incomplete. Statement 3 is also correct — the Communal Award by PM Ramsay MacDonald extended separate electorates to the Depressed Classes, which Gandhi opposed through his fast unto death.
- Option B
This is incomplete. Statement 2 is also correct — the 1919 Act expanded communal representation to Sikhs, Anglo-Indians, Indian Christians, and Europeans beyond the Muslim separate electorates.
- Option C
This is incomplete. Statement 1 is also correct — the Morley-Minto Reforms of 1909 first introduced separate electorates for Muslims, accepting the demand made through the Simla Deputation of 1906.