12 sample questions are shown here; sign up free to practise all 80.
Q1History & Culture·Mughal IndiaPYQ 2022
'Yogavasistha' was translated into Persian by Nizamuddin Panipati during the reign of:
- AAkbarCorrect
- BHumayun
- CShah Jahan
- DAurangzeb
Explanation
Correct. Akbar's court sponsored large-scale translation of Sanskrit works into Persian. The Yogavasistha, a philosophical text attributed to Valmiki, was rendered into Persian by Nizamuddin Panipati under Akbar's patronage as part of his broader project of cultural synthesis.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option B
Humayun's reign was marked by political instability and exile. He did not preside over the systematic translation programme that characterised Akbar's court.
- Option C
Shah Jahan patronised architecture and the arts, but the translation of Yogavasistha into Persian by Nizamuddin Panipati is historically placed during Akbar's reign, not Shah Jahan's.
- Option D
Aurangzeb's court was comparatively less engaged in translating Hindu philosophical texts. The translation belongs to the earlier period of Akbar's intellectual eclecticism.
Q2History & Culture·Mughal IndiaPYQ 2021
With reference to medieval India, which one of the following is the correct sequence in ascending order in terms of size?
- APargana, Sarkar, SubaCorrect
- BSarkar, Pargana, Suba
- CSuba, Sarkar, Pargana
- DPargana, Suba, Sarkar
Explanation
Correct. Under Mughal provincial administration, the pargana was the smallest unit (a cluster of villages), followed by the sarkar (district comprising several parganas), and then the suba (province comprising several sarkars). This ascending order is Pargana < Sarkar < Suba.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option B
This reverses the positions of pargana and sarkar. A sarkar was larger than a pargana, not smaller.
- Option C
This is the descending order, not ascending. Suba was the largest unit, not the smallest.
- Option D
This incorrectly places suba between pargana and sarkar. The suba was the largest provincial unit, not an intermediate one.
Q3History & Culture·Mughal IndiaPYQ 2019
With reference to Mughal India, what is/are the difference/differences between Jagirdar and Zamindar?
1. Jagirdars were holders of land assignments in lieu of judicial and police duties, whereas Zamindars were holders of revenue rights without obligation to perform any duty other than revenue collection.
2. Land assignments to Jagirdars were hereditary and revenue rights of Zamindars were not hereditary.
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
- A1 only
- B2 only
- CBoth 1 and 2
- DNeither 1 nor 2Correct
Explanation
Correct. Neither statement accurately describes the distinction. Jagirs were revenue assignments tied to mansabdari service and were transferable, not hereditary. Zamindars held local hereditary rights and had wider responsibilities than just revenue collection. Both descriptions in the statements are misleading.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Statement 1 is incorrect. Jagirdars held revenue assignments in lieu of salary for military and administrative service, not specifically judicial and police duties. Zamindars also had obligations beyond mere revenue collection, including maintaining law and order locally.
- Option B
Statement 2 is incorrect. Jagir assignments were generally non-hereditary and transferable at the emperor's will. Zamindari rights, by contrast, often were hereditary in practice.
- Option C
Both statements contain factual errors about the nature of jagirdari and zamindari systems under the Mughals.
Q4History & Culture·Mughal IndiaPYQ 2018
Which one of the following foreign travellers elaborately discussed about diamonds and diamond mines of India?
- AFrancois Bernier
- BJean-Baptiste TavernierCorrect
- CJean de Thevenot
- DAbbe Barthelemy Carre
Explanation
Correct. Jean-Baptiste Tavernier was a 17th-century French jeweller and traveller who made six voyages to India. His 'Travels in India' contains the most detailed contemporary European account of Indian diamond mines, including Golconda, and the gem trade.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Francois Bernier was a French physician who wrote extensively about Mughal politics, economy and the condition of peasants, but diamonds and mines were not his primary focus.
- Option C
Jean de Thevenot was a French traveller who described Indian cities and customs but did not provide elaborate accounts of diamond mines comparable to Tavernier.
- Option D
Abbe Barthelemy Carre travelled in India in the 1670s and wrote about trade and Jesuit missions, but his work does not contain detailed discussions of diamond mines.
Q5History & Culture·Mughal IndiaPYQ 2015
Consider the following: The arrival of Babur into India led to the:
1. Introduction of gunpowder
2. Introduction of the arch and dome in the region's architecture
3. Establishment of Timurid dynasty
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
- A1 and 2 only
- B1 and 3 only
- C3 onlyCorrect
- D1, 2 and 3
Explanation
Correct. Babur's primary historical contribution was establishing the Timurid (Mughal) dynasty in India. Gunpowder and arch-dome architecture both pre-dated his arrival — the former was known from at least the 14th century and the latter was introduced during the Delhi Sultanate.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Gunpowder was already known in India before Babur's arrival. The Delhi Sultanate period saw the use of gunpowder weapons, and arch-dome architecture was introduced much earlier by Turkish and Afghan rulers.
- Option B
Statement 1 is incorrect. Gunpowder was used in India before 1526. While Babur employed it more effectively with field artillery and matchlocks, he did not introduce it to the subcontinent.
- Option D
Statements 1 and 2 are both incorrect. Only statement 3, the establishment of the Timurid-Mughal line in India, is a valid consequence of Babur's invasion.
Q6History & Culture·Mughal IndiaPYQ 2014
Ibadat Khana at Fatehpur Sikri was:
- AThe mosque for the use of the Royal Family
- BAkbar's private chamber of prayer
- CThe hall in which Akbar held discussions with scholars of various religionsCorrect
- DThe room in which nobles belonging to different religions gathered to discuss religious affairs
Explanation
Correct. The Ibadat Khana (House of Worship) was established by Akbar in 1575 at Fatehpur Sikri as a hall for religious discussions. Scholars from various faiths — including Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Jains, Zoroastrians and others — were invited to debate theology and philosophy.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
The Ibadat Khana was not a mosque. Fatehpur Sikri had a separate Jama Masjid for congregational prayers. The Ibadat Khana served a completely different function.
- Option B
It was not a private prayer chamber. Akbar built the Ibadat Khana specifically for hosting inter-religious dialogues, not personal devotion.
- Option D
The discussions were initiated and presided over by Akbar himself with invited scholars and theologians, not merely a gathering room for nobles of different faiths.
Q7History & Culture·Mughal IndiaPYQ 2004
How did the dynasty of Nizam Shahis of Ahmadnagar come to an end?
- AAhmadnagar was annexed into the Mughal Empire and Husain Shah was consigned to life imprisonmentCorrect
- BMughal troops destroyed Daulatabad fort and killed Nizam-ul-Mulk of Ahmadnagar
- CFateh Khan usurped the throne from Nizam-ul-Mulk
- DMalik Ambar was defeated in a battle with Mughals in 1631 and the entire royal family was killed by the Mughal troops
Explanation
Correct. The Nizam Shahi dynasty of Ahmadnagar ended when the Mughal forces under Shah Jahan finally annexed the sultanate in 1636. The last ruler, Husain Shah, was captured and imprisoned for life.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option B
Daulatabad fort was not destroyed. It was besieged and eventually fell to the Mughals, but the end of the Nizam Shahi dynasty came through the imprisonment of Husain Shah, not the killing of a ruler named Nizam-ul-Mulk.
- Option C
Fateh Khan did not usurp the Nizam Shahi throne in the manner described. The dynasty ended through Mughal annexation.
- Option D
Malik Ambar died of natural causes in 1626, before the final Mughal conquest. The entire royal family was not massacred; the last ruler was imprisoned.
Q8History & Culture·Mughal IndiaPYQ 2003
The Battle of Dharmat was fought between:
- AMuhammad Ghori and Jai Chand
- BBabur and the Afghans
- CAurangzeb and Dara ShikohCorrect
- DAhmad Shah Durrani and the Marathas
Explanation
Correct. The Battle of Dharmat (1658) was fought between the forces of Aurangzeb (led by his generals) and the imperial army supporting Dara Shikoh during the Mughal war of succession. Dara's forces were decisively defeated.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Muhammad Ghori fought Jai Chand at the Battle of Chandawar (1194 CE), not Dharmat.
- Option B
Babur fought the Afghans at various battles including the First Battle of Panipat (1526), but not at Dharmat.
- Option D
Ahmad Shah Durrani fought the Marathas at the Third Battle of Panipat (1761), not at Dharmat.
Q9History & Culture·Mughal IndiaPYQ 2003
How did the Mughal Emperor Jahandar Shah's reign come to an early end?
- AHe was deposed by his wazir
- BHe died due to a slip while climbing down steps
- CHe was defeated by his nephew in a battleCorrect
- DHe died of sickness due to too much consumption of wine
Explanation
Correct. Jahandar Shah was defeated in 1713 by his nephew Farrukhsiyar (supported by the Sayyid brothers) at the Battle of Agra. He was subsequently captured and executed, ending his brief reign of about one year.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Jahandar Shah was not deposed by his wazir Zulfiqar Khan. His downfall came through military defeat by a family member.
- Option B
There is no historical account of Jahandar Shah dying from an accidental fall. His reign ended through political and military conflict.
- Option D
While Jahandar Shah was known for his dissolute lifestyle, his reign ended through military defeat, not illness from excessive drinking.
Q10History & Culture·Mughal IndiaPYQ 2003
Assertion (A): Emperor Akbar marched towards Afghanistan in 1581 with a huge army.
Reason (R): He was on his way to reclaim his ancestral country of Ferghana in Central Asia.
- ABoth A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A
- BBoth A and R are individually true but R is NOT the correct explanation of A
- CA is true but R is falseCorrect
- DA is false but R is true
Explanation
Correct. Akbar did march towards Afghanistan in 1581 with a large army, but the purpose was to deal with the rebellion of his half-brother Mirza Muhammad Hakim, the governor of Kabul. Reclaiming Ferghana was not his objective.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
R is false. Akbar's march to Afghanistan in 1581 was to suppress the revolt of his half-brother Mirza Muhammad Hakim in Kabul, not to reclaim Ferghana.
- Option B
Since R is false, this option cannot be correct.
- Option D
A is not false. Historical sources confirm Akbar's military expedition towards Afghanistan in 1581.
Q11History & Culture·Mughal IndiaPYQ 2002
The motive behind Shah Jahan's Balkh campaign was to:
- ASecure a friendly ruler in Balkh and Badakhshan which bordered KabulCorrect
- BConquer Samarkand and Ferghana, the Mughal homelands
- CFix the Mughal frontier on the scientific line, the Amu Darya
- DExpand the Mughal Empire beyond the subcontinent
Explanation
Correct. Shah Jahan's Balkh campaign (1646–1647) was primarily motivated by the desire to install a friendly ruler in Balkh and Badakhshan, regions that bordered Kabul and were vital for the security of the Mughal northwestern frontier.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option B
While the Mughals had ancestral connections to Samarkand and Ferghana, the immediate strategic objective was frontier security near Kabul, not the reconquest of distant ancestral homelands.
- Option C
Fixing the frontier on the Amu Darya was not the stated or primary motive. The campaign was about ensuring a friendly buffer state rather than establishing a permanent river boundary.
- Option D
The campaign was defensive-strategic in nature, aimed at protecting existing territories, not expansionist ambition beyond the subcontinent.
Q12History & Culture·Mughal IndiaPYQ 2001
Which among the following ports was called Babul Makka (Gate of Mecca) during the Mughal Period?
- ACalicut
- BBroach
- CCambay
- DSuratCorrect
Explanation
Correct. Surat was called Babul Makka (Gate of Mecca) because it was the principal port from which Indian Muslims embarked on the Hajj pilgrimage to Mecca. It was also the chief commercial port of the Mughal Empire.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option A
Calicut (Kozhikode) was a major spice-trade port on the Malabar coast, but it was not known as Babul Makka. It was more associated with the Zamorin rulers and Arab-Chinese trade.
- Option B
Broach (Bharuch) was an ancient port in Gujarat but did not carry the designation Babul Makka during the Mughal period.
- Option C
Cambay (Khambhat) was an important trading port but had silted up considerably by the Mughal era and was not called Babul Makka.